blm oil and gas changes

The Bureau of Land Management quietly slid through significant oil and gas rule changes last week, labeling them “noncontroversial” to fast-track the process. This clever little move drastically cut the public comment period—because apparently rewriting how our public lands get leased for drilling isn’t worth much discussion.

The changes stem from the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” passed back in July 2025. BLM insists these are merely “procedural adjustments” rather than policy shifts. Right. Just some light tinkering with definitions like “eligible” and “available” for oil and gas leasing. Nothing to see here, folks.

BLM’s so-called “procedural adjustments” redefine our public lands as drilling playgrounds. Just following orders, they say. How convenient.

BLM’s justification? They’re just following orders from Congress. The agency claims the changes simply implement mandates from the OBBB legislation, with minimal discretionary wiggle room on their part. Convenient narrative.

The modifications include new fee structures for Expressions of Interest, updated royalty calculations, and revised protocols for competitive lease nominations. They’re also “modernizing” rules for commingling well production—a mundane-sounding change with potentially major implications.

By slapping the “noncontroversial” label on these changes, BLM effectively limits scrutiny. Environmental groups and other stakeholders now face tight deadlines to prepare responses. Critical oversight? Optional, apparently.

Industry groups seem pretty happy with the streamlining. Shocking. They’ve welcomed the predictability and efficiency of this express-lane rulemaking process. Meanwhile, advocacy organizations have raised eyebrows at how these substantive changes somehow qualify as “noncontroversial.”

The most affected areas include land eligibility definitions, fee and royalty formulas, and public notification processes. In other words, the entire framework for how public lands get offered up for drilling.

The BLM maintains these changes will “increase transparency and standardize leasing procedures.” Because nothing says transparency quite like rushing through regulatory changes with minimal public input. Democracy in action, folks.

References

You May Also Like

Budget Guillotine: Trump Slashes Billions From Science, Climate, and Infrastructure Programs

Trump’s “Budget Guillotine” sacrifices $163 billion in science and infrastructure funding. America’s research landscape faces devastation as environmental programs and health services hang in the balance.

Supreme Court Decimates Environmental Protection Law in Unanimous Bombshell

Supreme Court’s unanimous 8-0 bombshell guts environmental protections, leaving climate advocates reeling while industry celebrates unprecedented victory.

House Narrowly Passes Funding Bill: Environmental Programs Face the Axe

Congress barely averts shutdown while gutting environmental protection by $1.8 billion. Clean air programs face brutal 60% cuts. Dark days loom for environmental justice. Senate battle awaits.

Florida’s Lawmakers Unite: Unprecedented Push to Permanently Ban Coastal Oil Drilling

Florida thwarted Trump’s drilling dreams once. Now lawmakers are fighting for coastal waters worth $13.8 billion annually. Your beach vacation depends on what happens next.