regulatory relief for industries

The Trump administration dismantled nearly 100 environmental regulations during its term, dramatically reshaping America’s approach to pollution control and conservation. By the end of the administration, officials had completed rollbacks of 98 rules with 14 more in process. These changes targeted carbon emissions and climate policies that the administration viewed as burdensome to industry.

A key focus was revitalizing the coal industry through deregulation. The Clean Power Plan, which limited coal plant emissions, was revoked. Regulations on toxic wastewater from coal plants were eliminated or weakened. The administration also made it easier to lease federal lands for coal mining by reducing environmental oversight requirements. This shift away from renewables contributed to green energy stocks crashing back to 2019 levels.

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) underwent major changes, with review processes shortened and streamlined. Projects no longer needed to evaluate “cumulative” or “indirect” environmental impacts, making approvals faster. Executive Order 13807 directed federal agencies to limit public comment periods and complete reviews within two years. Communities with limited resources found it particularly difficult to engage in the process as public comment periods were significantly shortened.

Chemical and industrial regulations faced similar cuts. The EPA’s budget was proposed to be reduced by 31%, limiting resources for toxic waste oversight. Federal monitoring of hazardous chemical storage was weakened, while industrial pollution standards were reduced or enforced less strictly. The administration’s policies were specifically designed to benefit the chemicals industry through relaxed regulations.

The administration withdrew from the Paris Climate Agreement on its first day in office, signaling its approach to environmental policy. Officials often justified these changes as “giving power back to states,” though federal preemption of stricter state standards was encouraged in some sectors like auto emissions.

Environmental groups raised concerns about these policy shifts. They warned of increased air and water pollution, especially in vulnerable communities. Changes to the Endangered Species Act reduced protections for at-risk wildlife. Critics noted that communities faced greater difficulties challenging high-pollution projects due to shortened review periods and reduced federal oversight.

References

You May Also Like

Indiana Law Now Calls Gas and Propane ‘Clean’ – Environmentalists Furious

Indiana reclassifies fossil fuels as “clean energy” while environmentalists warn methane is worse than CO2. Who decides what’s truly clean? The battle lines are drawn.

Policy Blunders Crush Clean Energy: The Hidden Cost of Tariffs Bankrupting America’s Solar Future

Government tariffs meant to save American solar are secretly destroying it while power outages multiply 125-fold nationwide.

Federal Agencies Forced to Abandon Paper-Based NEPA Reviews in Radical Tech Overhaul

Federal agencies ditch paper for digital NEPA reviews, promising faster permits and transparency. But what happens when rural America can’t access these mandatory online systems? Environmental goals may hang in the balance.

28-Day Revolution: Federal Fast-Track Overrides Environmental Review Process for Energy Projects

Federal agencies ram through energy projects in days instead of years while silencing public input. Environmental protections crumble as 600+ permits rush toward approval. Communities will bear the consequences.